Dias v. Burberry Limited
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LIUBOV DIAS, Case No. 21-cv-192-MMA (JLB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 14 BURBERRY LIMITED and BRADLEY MOTION TO COMPEL MOORE, 15 ARBITRATION Defendants. 16 [Doc. Nos. 13, 19] 17 18 19 Liubov Dias (“Plaintiff”) alleges that Defendants Burberry Limited (“Burberry”) 20 and Bradley Moore (“Moore”) (collectively, “Defendants”) discriminated and retaliated 21 against Plaintiff. See Doc. No. 1-2 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 10, 20. Defendants removed this 22 action from…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.