Legal Opinion
Steelcase, Inc. v. Smart Technologies, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 5, 2004No. 1:03-cv-00476PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Background
Plaintiffs, Steelcase Inc. (“Steelcase”), PolyVision Corporation (“PolyVision”), and Greensteel, Inc. (“Greensteel”), filed their complaint against Defendant, Smart Technologies, Inc. (“STI”), on July 15, 2003, alleging that STI is willfully infringing United States Patent No. 5,838,309 (the “'309 patent”), and that Plaintiffs are not infringing United States Patent Nos. 5,448,263 (the “'263 patent”) and 6,141,000 (the “'000 patent”), owned by STI. Count I alleged a claim for patent infringement, Count II requested a declaratory judgment that Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Lynch v. Vanderhoef BuildersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- William B. Scheidt and Wanda C. Scheidt v. William Randolph KleinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Smith v. Kyphon, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
- Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. O'LEARY PAINT CO., INC.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Wayne County Employees' Retirement System v. MGIC Investment Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- B.E. Technology, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Bushnell, Inc. v. Brunton Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.