Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kyphon, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided September 22, 2008No. Civil Action 3:08cv0329PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS A WISEMAN, JR., Senior District Judge.

Now before the Court is a Motion to Change Venue (Doc. No. 20) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), brought by defendants Kyphon, Inc., Andrew “Drew” Ham-ric and Medtronic, Inc. Plaintiff Dana Smith opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Dana H. Smith brought this action in Tennessee state court in April 2008 asserting claims against all the defendants for violation of the Tennessee Handicap Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Sacklow v. Saks Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  2. Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. O'LEARY PAINT CO., INC.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  3. United States v. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
  4. Finley v. KellyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  5. Commissioning Agents, Inc. v. LongDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2016

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API