Beattie v. Beattie
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Paul Beattie (Paul) appeals from a divorce judgment entered in the Superior Court (Pe-nobscot County, MacInnes, A.R.J.) contending that the alimony and spousal support awarded Lucille Beattie (Lucille) are excessive, and the division of the parties’ marital property inequitable. We agree with Paul and vacate the judgment.
We review a trial court’s findings of fact only for clear error, and will not disturb an alimony award or property division unless it violates a positive rule of law or reaches a plainly and unmistakably unjust result. Harding v. Murray, 623 A.2d 172, 175…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harding v. MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Terison v. TerisonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Deditch v. DeditchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dargie v. DargieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Austin v. AustinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Sorey v. SoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Tibbetts v. TibbettsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Melanson v. MathesonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.