Legal Opinion
Harding v. Murray
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 13, 1993PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Richard Murray challenges the portions of a Superior Court (Cumberland County, Beaudoin, J) divorce judgment: (1) assessing liability for alimony, support and attorney fees following Murray’s discharge in bankruptcy; (2) determining and allocating responsibility for marital debts; (3) determining and awarding Harding alimony; (4) requiring Murray to maintain life insurance for the benefit of Harding; and (5) determining and awarding responsibility to pay for Harding’s attorney fees. Because we find that the Superior Court erred: (1) in ordering Murray to maintain $250,000…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In The Matter Of M. Frenville Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Robert B. Sutton and Sutton Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Carter Day Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (In Re Combustion Equipment Associates, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Most v. MostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Hohenberg v. Hohenberg (In Re Hohenberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Peters v. PetersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Arey v. AreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Brasslett v. Brasslett (In Re Brasslett)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1999
- Compagnone v. Compagnone (In Re Compagnone)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Rosen v. RosenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.