Melanson v. Matheson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Edward A. Matheson appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Alexander, J.) affirming the order of the District Court (Bangor, Russell, J.) denying Mathesoris motion for post-judgment relief in which he sought to reduce his alimony obligations in light of his retirement and corresponding reduction of income. The District Court erred by failing to consider Matheson’s entire pension income in determining whether he was entitled to a reduction of his alimony obligation. Because, however, we agree with the result reached by the District…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Bryant v. BryantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Wardwell v. WardwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Gray v. GraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burdzel v. SobusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Miele v. MieleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Sorey v. SoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Barclay v. EckertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Frost Vacationland Properties, Inc. v. PalmerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.