Legal Opinion

Oaks v. Weingartner

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1951No. Civ. 7957PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment which denied to plaintiff his claim that his materialman’s lien was superior to the lien of a deed of trust securing certain advances made after the recordation of the deed of trust. On October 2, 1945, Hartley L. and Nellie 0. Weingartner executed to John and Catherine Pehau, respondents herein, a deed of trust. The instrument recited that it was given as security for the repayment of a loan of $4,178 borrowed by the trustors as evidenced by a promissory note in that amount concurrently executed. The instrument contained provisions that it was also to secure…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tapia v. DemartiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Frank H. Buck Co. v. BuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Sain v. SilvestreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Bear Creek Master Ass'n v. S. Cal. Investors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Equitable Plan Co. v. Dix Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Imhoff v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API