Legal Opinion

Frank H. Buck Co. v. Buck

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1912No. Sac. No. 1907PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County and from an order refusing a new trial. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Appellant, California Fruit Exchange, a corporation, is the mortgagee of a recorded crop mortgage executed to it by respondent F. M. Buck. It claims priority of right and lien by virtue of this crop mortgage and by virtue of an unrecorded crop contract also executed to it by F. M. Buck, over a subsequent chattel mortgage executed by F. M. Buck to respondent Frank H. Buck Company, a corporation. The action was commenced by the Frank H. Buck Company to foreclose its chattel mortgage for the sum of fifteen thousand dollars and for a decree establishing its priority of right over the California…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKean v. German-American Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Tapia v. DemartiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lovelace v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  4. Witczinski v. EvermanMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Tully v. HarloeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CasadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Bank of New York Mellon v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Second National Bank of Warren v. BoyleOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Batten v. Jurist (Northwestern Nat. Bank, Etc., Co.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Reidy v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API