Legal Opinion

Kennett v. Yates

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1952No. 32217PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

In this action, plaintiff sought to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered as the proximate result of his falling through a door from which defendants had removed a large plate glass panel which had been broken from some unknown cause.

Defendants are the owners of the Smith Tower, a large office_building in Seattle, and their property managers who operate the building. Plaintiff is a practicing attorney, who, on February 4, 1948, when the accident occurred, had been a tenant in the Smith Tower for approximately twenty-two years.

In his complaint plaintiff made several allegations of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Eckerson v. Ford's Prairie School District No. 11Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mulka v. KeyesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Andrews v. McCutcheonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Lamping v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  2. Lewis v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Qualls v. Golden Arrow Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Kennett v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Anderson v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API