Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 9, 1987No. 7561-3-IIIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

48 Wn. App. 432 (1987)

739 P.2d 1177

STEVE ANDERSON, Appellant,

v.

DREIS & KRUMP MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 7561-3-III.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

July 9, 1987.

R. Bruce Owens and Howard & Owens, for appellant.

Frederic G. Fancher and Richter-Wimberley, P.S., for respondent.

MUNSON, J.

Steve Anderson brought this products liability action to recover damages for personal injuries received while operating a Chicago Press Brake (press) manufactured by Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Corporation. Mr. Anderson alleged Dreis was liable under theories of breach of warranty,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API