Legal Opinion

Mulka v. Keyes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1952No. 32092PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an action for malpractice. Defendant Roswell P. Keyes is a physician and surgeon practicing his profession in Bellingham, as is the other defendant, his brother Howard. On June 18, 1947, after having diagnosed plaintiff wife’s physical trouble as an ovarian cyst, Roswell operated on her for the purpose of removing it. Howard served as his assistant in the surgery.

In the course of the operation Roswell cut the patient’s left ureter about two-thirds through. The ureter is a muscular tube whose function is to carry urine from the kidney to the bladder. Howard attempted to repair the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Marlowe v. PatrickWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Mulka v. KeyesWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. General Motors Corporation v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Bartlett v. HantoverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Coleman v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API