Legal Opinion

Lamping v. Ripley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1934No. 25012. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

These four cases, all growing out of the same accident, were consolidated for the purpose of trial and tried to the same jury. By stipulation, they have also been consolidated for the purposes of this appeal.

An automobile owned by respondents and driven by the respondent wife came into a head-on collision with the machine operated by the appellant on Thirty-second avenue in the city of Seattle in the evening of a July day in 1932, resulting in personal injuries to the respondent wife and to each of the three minor children of the respondents who were riding with her.

The trial to the jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Allend v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Ziomko v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Anselmo v. MorsingWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roumel v. FudeWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Robinson v. EbertWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Goodner v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Pritchett v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Kennett v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API