Legal Opinion

Glasscock v. Glasscock

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 11, 1991No. 23364PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Chief Justice:

This appeal is from a family court order awarding attorney’s fees. We affirm as modified.

The total marital estate in this case is valued at nearly $2.8 million. In the final decree, the award to respondent (Wife), including alimony and her equitable share in marital assets, was approximately $1.6 million dollars. At the hearing on Wife’s request for attorney’s fees, Wife’s attorney submitted affidavits that his fee based on an hourly rate totalled $51,998.75. The hourly rates were: $125 per hour for his services; $75 per hour for his associate’s services; $150 per hour…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Darden v. WithamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  2. Donahue v. DonahueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. First Union Nat. Bank of SC v. SodenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Wooten v. WootenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Bakala v. BakalaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Crossland v. CrosslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API