Hilliard v. United Pacific Casualty Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, C. J.
Plaintiffs brought this suit on a policy of liability insurance seeking reimbursement on account of payment by them of a judgment which had been obtained against them in a prior action by persons claiming damages resulting from an automobile collision. In the present action, the court, after making its findings and drawing its conclusions, entered judgment adverse to plaintiffs, from which they have appealed.
The policy upon which this action is based is a standard form of liability insurance issued by respondent on a Ford truck owned by appellants and used by them in their glass and paint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Allegretto v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Buckner v. BucknerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Eakle v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Shafer v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Burr v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Weaver v. McClintock-trunkey Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Tierney v. Safeco InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.