Legal Opinion
United States v. Rebelo
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 2, 2005No. Civ. 01-2120 (HAA)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff United States of America’s (the “Government”) motion for summary judgment and, in the alternative, to strike Defendant’s remaining affirmative defenses. This matter is also before the Court on Defendant Marco Paulo Rebelo’s (“Rebe-lo”) cross-motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the Government’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on the ground of illegal procurement of naturalization because Rebelo was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude during the statutory…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marek PARTYKA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Jean-Louis v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. RebeloDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- United States v. BogackiDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
- Marek PARTYKA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.