Legal Opinion

Jean-Louis v. Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 6, 2009No. 07-3311PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RENDELL, Circuit Judge.

We are called upon to decide whether simple assault under Pennsylvania law, where the victim is under 12 years of age and the assailant is over 20 years of age, is a crime involving moral turpitude for purposes of cancellation of removal. In doing so we must address a recent opinion of the Attorney General that adopts a novel framework for determining whether a petitioner has been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude (“CIMT”). We conclude that the petitioner was not convicted of a CIMT, and that we will apply our established methodology for…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. TittiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Denis v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Paul PavulakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. BeardsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API