Legal Opinion
Marek PARTYKA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 11, 2005No. 04-2804Published
1Opinion of the Court
417 F.3d 408
Marek PARTYKA, Petitioner
v.
* ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, Respondent.
* (Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 43(c)).
No. 04-2804.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued March 30, 2005.
Filed August 11, 2005.
Joseph C. Hohenstein (Argued), James J. Orlow, Orlow & Orlow, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.
Bryan S. Beier (Argued), Linda S. Wernery, Jocelyn L. Wright, William C. Peachey, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before ALITO, SMITH, and ROSENN Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
1
The…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Saidou Dia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Jean Patrick Michel v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Jan Knapik v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- FLORESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.