Legal Opinion

Tobin v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1923No. 17888PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

This was a suit for damages on account of personal injuries. After the cause was at issue, had been called for trial and a jury made up, the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence on the part of the plaintiff because the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court sustained the objection and entered an order dismissing the case, and the plaintiff has appealed.

After alleging that the respondent is a municipal corporation and owns and operates the street car system in the city of Seattle, the complaint states:

“III. That on or about the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Eskildsen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Foster v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Turner v. City Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hillyard v. Utah By-Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Smith v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McDonald v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Lepore v. Rhode Island Public Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  5. United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API