Legal Opinion

Larson v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1946No. 29924PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiff brought action against the city of Seattle for personal injuries. Trial to a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant filed a motion for new trial upon the grounds of irregularity in the proceeding of the court, jury, or adverse party; excessive damages which indicated passion or prejudice on the part of the jury; that there was no evidence or reasonable inference from the evidence to justify the verdict, and error of law occurring at the trial. The court granted the motion on the sole and specific ground that he had'made an error in the giving of one instruction.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hewitt v. SteeleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Ittner v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Kalinowski v. Y.W.C.A.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Young v. DilleWashington Supreme Court · 1923

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsenWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. LuckyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Carle v. McChord Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. State v. LuckyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Johnson v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API