Legal Opinion

Gabrielsen v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1928No. 21064. Department OnePublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, C. J.

Seneca street is a public street of the city of Seattle. Its course, at the place of the acci dent hereinafter mentioned, is approximately east and west. Between the streets known as Fourth avenue and Third avenue, it is paved with stone blocks, and has a downward slope of fifteen and four-tenths per cent. Midway of the block between the avenues named, is an alley extending north and south.

The appellant Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company owns the lot lying on the north side of Seneca street, extending from Third avenue back to the alley. Prior to the time of the accident referred to,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Lund v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Jones v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Berglund v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Slattery v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Burge v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Caylor v. B. C. Motor Transportation, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. James v. BurchettWashington Supreme Court · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API