Legal Opinion
Ten Eyck v. Industrial Forklifts Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 1989No. B039523PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Kenneth Ten Eyck (plaintiff) appeals from an order of the Los Angeles Superior Court which granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant Industrial Forklifts Co. (Industrial). For the reasons discussed below, his appeal is untimely and must be dismissed.
Procedural Background
On October 3, 1985, plaintiff filed a complaint for personal injuries against Industrial and two other defendants, Clark-Lift of Los Angeles, Inc. and Clark Equipment & Industrial Truck Division (hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as the defendants). In the complaint, plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doctors' Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Eddy v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Rojes v. Riverside General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Magallanes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Tri-County Elevator Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Passavanti v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Stephen v. Enterprise Rent-A-CarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Payne v. RaderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ramon v. Aerospace Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- APRI Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.