Stephen v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SMITH, J.
—Plaintiff Charles Stephen brought this individual and purported class action against defendants Enterprise Rent-A-Car of San Francisco and others (collectively Enterprise) 1 seeking relief, on various theories, for alleged unconscionably high rates charged by Enterprise for a risk-allocation option called collision damage waiver (CDW) in its rental contracts. Stephen appeals from an order denying, as untimely, his “Renewed Motion for Class Certification,” brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 1008, subdivision (b). We will affirm the order.
Background
The following fact…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Alch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Franco v. Athens Disposal Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.