Legal Opinion

Semler v. Klang

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 3, 2009No. Civil 08-919 (JNE/RLE)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, Chief United States Magistrate Judge, on February 9, 2009. The magistrate judge recommended that the motion to dismiss of Rick Koop, John A. Bolduc, and Kyle Huber be granted, that Erick Klang’s motion to dismiss be granted, and that Plaintiffs motion for default judgment against Klang be denied. 1 Plaintiff filed objections. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell O/B/O X.M. v. Dakota Cnty. Soc. Servs.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
  2. Griffin v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
  3. Jackson v. Marathon CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  4. Johnson v. PatelDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
  5. Knapp v. Compass Minnesota, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API