Legal Opinion

Peerless Lighting Corp. v. American Motorists Ins.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 2000No. A082975, A083487, A084373PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

This case presents the issue of whether a liability insurer providing coverage for “advertising injury” was required to defend and indemnify an insured for infringement of “trade dress” that allegedly arose through the insured’s solicitation of a single customer through a competitive bidding process with a product specifically designed for that customer. When the appellant, American Motorists Insurance Co. (AMICO) refused to provide a defense, Peerless Lighting Corporation (Peerless) filed an action for declaratory relief. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Hameid v. National Fire Insurance of HartfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Solers, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
  4. Singh v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Street Surfing, LLC v. Great American E & S InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API