Peerless Lighting Corp. v. American Motorists Ins.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
This case presents the issue of whether a liability insurer providing coverage for “advertising injury” was required to defend and indemnify an insured for infringement of “trade dress” that allegedly arose through the insured’s solicitation of a single customer through a competitive bidding process with a product specifically designed for that customer. When the appellant, American Motorists Insurance Co. (AMICO) refused to provide a defense, Peerless Lighting Corporation (Peerless) filed an action for declaratory relief. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Hameid v. National Fire Insurance of HartfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Solers, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Singh v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Street Surfing, LLC v. Great American E & S InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.