Legal Opinion

Singh v. Singh

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 2004No. A100705PublishedCited by 21 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAMBDEN, J.

The Sikh Temple-San Francisco Bay Area, Inc. (the Sikh Temple) 1 and its current board of directors (also referred to as the Supreme Council or Panj Pyaras), 2 Gurdial Singh, Harjot Singh, Amarjit Singh, Gurdev Singh, and Mota Singh, challenge a judgment following a bench trial. The Sikh Temple members Ala Singh, Kamail Singh, Ram Singh, Sukhdev Singh, Harjinder Singh, Joginder Singh, and Gurmeet Singh (collectively respondents or plaintiffs) sued the Sikh Temple and its current board of directors (collectively appellants or defendants) because they alleged that the board of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lynch v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Wallace v. JaffreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Episcopal Church CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Smith v. Adventist Health System/WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Grewal v. JammuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Scheenstra v. California Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Mueller v. ZimmerWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API