Dieckmeyer v. Redevelopment Agency
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, J.
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Huntington Beach (collectively the City unless otherwise stated) appeal from a judgment that directed issuance of a writ of mandate. The writ compelled the City to accept prepayment of Barbara Dieckmeyer’s promissory note and reconvey a deed of trust securing the note. The City argues it was entitled to impose additional conditions on repayment, to protect its right to an equity share and ensure compliance with recorded affordable housing restrictions. Alternatively, the City argues the existing deed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Ridgley v. Topa Thrift & Loan Assn.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Tisher v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Stub v. BelmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Battram v. Emerald Bay Community Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by14 opinions
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Christina N.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Apollo Capital Fund, LLC v. Roth Capital Partners, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Telish v. Cal. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Truong v. GlasserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.