Legal Opinion

Battram v. Emerald Bay Community Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1984No. Civ. 30469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

The facts are not in dispute. Emerald Bay is a private self-contained community of over 500 homes. There are 11 tracts in the community, subject to virtually identical covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs). The Emerald Bay Community Association (Association) administers the rights and obligations created by all the CC&Rs and establishes a fiscal year budget, funded by imposing homeowner fees against the properties.

The CC&Rs prescribe these fees as a percentage of the assessed value of each property. Article XI of the CC&Rs requires assessed values be determined…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. County of Marin v. Assessment Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Stadium Concessions, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Howe v. American Baptist Homes of the West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ticor Title Insurance v. Rancho Santa Fe Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Dieckmeyer v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Castillo v. Cleannet USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. Cebular v. COOPER ARMS HOMEOWNERS ASS'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Cebular v. COOPER ARMS HOMEOWNERS ASS'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API