Stub v. Belmont
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment for $2,000 and a penalty of $100 entered against him pursuant to plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. The penalty of $100 was awarded pursuant to section 2941 of the Civil Code providing therefor in cases where a mortgagee fails to give to the mortgagor a satisfaction of mortgage upon the payment thereof.
The following facts appear from the affirmative allegations in defendant’s answer, which must be taken as true in entertaining a motion for judgment on the pleadings (Cuneo v. Lawson, 203 Cal. 190 [263 Pac. 530]), and the undenied allegations of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dover Lumber Co. v. CaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Hamilton v. Oakland School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Cuneo v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Falkner, Bell & Co. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
- Wilson v. BogertIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Argonaut Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Hall v. CoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.