Legal Opinion

Stub v. Belmont

California Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1942No. L. A. 17715PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for $2,000 and a penalty of $100 entered against him pursuant to plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. The penalty of $100 was awarded pursuant to section 2941 of the Civil Code providing therefor in cases where a mortgagee fails to give to the mortgagor a satisfaction of mortgage upon the payment thereof.

The following facts appear from the affirmative allegations in defendant’s answer, which must be taken as true in entertaining a motion for judgment on the pleadings (Cuneo v. Lawson, 203 Cal. 190 [263 Pac. 530]), and the undenied allegations of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dover Lumber Co. v. CaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  2. B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Hamilton v. Oakland School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Cuneo v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Falkner, Bell & Co. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wilson v. BogertIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Argonaut Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Hall v. CoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API