Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Montgomery
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 10, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Feely, S.
On the new trial herein, counsel submitted specific findings which have been made in the decision filed on even date herewith, whereby this court has just awarded the duly discharged attorney for due part performance of his services the sum of $13,000, with interest, as the reasonable value thereof, pursuant to the opinion of the Appellate Division (Matter of Montgomery, 246 App. Div. 495), reversing on the law the previous decree awarding the attorney $4,166.66, which had been based on the theory of proportionate contract value discussed in Matter of Montgomery (156 Misc. 583).
While…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Matter of KrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Rubin v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Shirk v. BrookfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Wyckoff v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. MacPherson's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
- United States Ex Rel. Susi Contracting Co. v. Zara Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Michael Zaitsev v. Salomon Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- De Kwiatkowski v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Paul Hardeman, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.