Legal Opinion

Anonymous v. Anonymous

New York City Family Court

Decided December 17, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold A. Felix, J.

Respondent’s motion is granted and the petition is dismissed, but without prejudice. The proceedings herein were not timely instituted within the two-year period of limitations fixed by subdivision (a) of section 517 of the Family Court Act. ,Stricken from the face of the petition, presumably by the petitioner’s attorney, is the provision that the respondent has either acknowledged paternity in writing or by furnishing support. No inferences favorable to the petitioner can be drawn from her reference in her affidavit on this motion to respondent’s gift-giving of personal items of jewelry…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howard v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Tilson v. BarkNew York City Family Court · 1966
  3. Doe v. RoeNew York City Family Court · 1968
  4. Horn v. HortonNew York City Family Court · 1977
  5. Roe v. DoeNew York City Family Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API