Legal Opinion
Roe v. Doe
New York City Family Court
Decided January 8, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeter M. Horn, J.
This motion is brought by the respondent for an order:
1. Setting aside the decision in favor of the petitioner, dated September 27, 1966, in the interest of justice, on the grounds that said decision is contrary to law, contrary to the weight of the evidence; on the further grounds of newly discovered evidence, and surprise, and on all the grounds stated in the CPLR, and
2. Directing that a new hearing be held herein for the reasons set forth hereinabove, or
3. Setting aside the decision of Mr. Justice Peter M. Horn and rendering a decision in favor of the respondent on the ground that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russo v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Claim of Cheesman v. CheesmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Mossip v. F. H. Clement & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Claim of O'Esau v. E. W. Bliss Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Frehe v. SchildwachterNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Linnie D. B. v. Lonnie J. H.New York Family Court · 1970
- Barnett v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983