Doe v. Roe
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtLouis Otten, J.
In this paternity proceeding, respondent’s motion to dismiss raises interesting points of procedure, and petitioner’s cross motion for summary judgment presents a novel question in this type of proceeding.
Respondent’s motion under subdivision (a) of section 517 of the Family Court Act to dismiss the petition is denied without prejudice to his right to plead as a defense that the proceeding is barred by the two-year limitation set forth in that section. Although a motion to dismiss is a proper method of raising the defense of the limitation period (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 5; Matter of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1965
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wales v. GallanNew York Family Court · 1969
- In re HensonNew York City Family Court · 1974
- Downes v. KidwellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Albany County Department of Social Services ex rel. Judy T. v. John T.New York City Family Court · 1996