Legal Opinion
State v. Hosteen
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 4, 1996No. 16526PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLORES, Judge.
1. Defendant appeals from his conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DWI), contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 66-8-102(A) (Repl.Pamp.1994). Defendant raises three issues on appeal: (1) whether Defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to challenge the proof of prior convictions submitted by the State, and if so, (2) whether this case should be remanded to the trial court for resentencing as a misdemeanor DWI; and (8) whether Nichols v. United States, 511 U.S. 738, 114 S.Ct. 1921, 128 L.Ed.2d 745 (1994),…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. PlouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. FellhauerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.