Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzales

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1997No. 23531PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Justice.(1) Defendant Juan Floyd Gonzales appeals his convictions for felony DWI under NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102(G) (1994, prior to 1997 amendment). He contends the court erred in relying on his prior DWI convictions because he was not represented by counsel when he was convicted. Further, he contends that the court erred in enhancing his sentence, because the Legislature did not intend that NMSA 1978, § 31-18-17 (1993) (providing for alteration of basic sentence of habitual offender), apply to felony DWI. We affirm Gonzales’ conviction for felony DWI. We reverse his sentence and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. HugheyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API