Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2008No. 200,479-2PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

187 P.3d 254 (2008)

In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST Mark STANSFIELD, an attorney at law.

No. 200,479-2.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued January 15, 2008.

Decided July 17, 2008.

Mark Stansfield, Quincy, WA, Leland G. Ripley, Attorney at Law, Lake Stevens, WA, for Petitioner.

Natalea Skvir, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

CHAMBERS, J.

¶ 1 Mark Stansfield was admitted to the Washington State Bar in 1980 and was actively practicing law in 2003 when the cases underlying this matter began. Prior to these proceedings, he had no discipline…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Michael Crisp v. Jack R. Duckworth, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against EugsterWashington Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API