Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Eugster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2009No. 200,568-3PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 — Stephen K. Eugster practiced law for 34 years without a history of discipline.1 Then the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) charged Eugster with nine counts of attorney misconduct based on Eugster’s *299filing a guardianship petition against his former client without any investigation as to her alleged incompetency and failing to abide by the objectives of the representation. The hearing officer and Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association (Board) concluded Eugster violated eight current and former Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). The hearing officer recommended…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API