Krock v. Chroust
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
This appeal raises the novel issue of whether a jury verdict on a survival action should be reduced by $15,000.00, the maximum work loss benefits recoverable under the No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act. 1 We hold that the lower court improperly granted appellee’s motion to mold the verdict, and we hereby reinstate the original verdict of $100,000.00.
Appellant’s decedent was involved in an automobile accident on September 24, 1975, and died from his injuries twelve days later. Appellant thereafter filed a complaint in trespass alleging a survival cause of action and a wrongful…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Jolicoeur Furniture Co., Inc. v. BaldelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
- Mendralla v. Weaver Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Frey v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Mecca v. LukasikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.