Legal Opinion

Krock v. Chroust

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1984No. 1554PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

This appeal raises the novel issue of whether a jury verdict on a survival action should be reduced by $15,000.00, the maximum work loss benefits recoverable under the No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act. 1 We hold that the lower court improperly granted appellee’s motion to mold the verdict, and we hereby reinstate the original verdict of $100,000.00.

Appellant’s decedent was involved in an automobile accident on September 24, 1975, and died from his injuries twelve days later. Appellant thereafter filed a complaint in trespass alleging a survival cause of action and a wrongful…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Jolicoeur Furniture Co., Inc. v. BaldelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  3. Mendralla v. Weaver Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Frey v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Mecca v. LukasikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API