Legal Opinion

Frey v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1992No. 612PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order entered by the Honorable Robert Kemp, in the Court of Common Pleas of Tioga County, denying appellant’s motion to amend his complaint. Appellant’s request for amendment was made so that he could add a survival action after the statute of limitations had expired. Since we find that the lower court was correct in its denial of appellant’s motion, we affirm.

The underlying action in this case arose when appellant’s decedent, his son Ronald M. Frey, came into contact with a power line through a tree branch he was holding. Frey was killed as a result…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MacGregor v. Mediq Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Biglan v. BiglanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Krock v. ChroustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Nye v. COM. DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Mecca v. LukasikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Pisano v. Extendicare Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Moyer v. RubrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Baumgart v. Keene Building Products Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Jaindl v. MohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API