Legal Opinion
Guillen v. Schwarzenegger
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 2007No. A106873PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McGUINESS, P. J.
This case turns upon the interpretation of two interrelated, oft-amended statutes. During the period from fiscal year (FY) 2000-2001 through FY 2003-2004, Welfare and Institutions Code section 11453, subdivision (c)(3) made the state’s payment of cost of living adjustments (COLA’s) to CalWORK’s (California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids) grants dependent each year upon California motorists’ receipt of “any increase in tax relief’ pursuant to a separate statute, Revenue and Taxation Code former *933section 10754.1 In 2003, tax offsets for motorists under Revenue…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- O.W.L. Foundation v. City of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- City of Alhambra v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. WahidiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Searles Valley Minerals Operations, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Hong Sang Mkt., Inc. v. Peng, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.