Rinehart v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
This is an action brought by the named insureds, plaintiffs-appellants Gary Rinehart and Vicki Rinehart, husband and wife, to recover under the medical payment provisions of an automobile insurance policy issued by respondent Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Idaho. The case is of first impression in Idaho, and tests the validity of a subrogation clause in an automobile insurance policy, whereby the insurer, to the extent of advanced medical payments, is subrogated to the insured’s rights of recovery against third parties.
The facts of this case are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- DeCespedes v. Prudence Mut. Cas. Co. of Chicago, Ill.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Marks v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Remsen v. Midway Liquors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Weippe v. YarnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Munson v. State, Department of HighwaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Revello v. RevelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Maxwell v. Allstate Insurance CompaniesNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Allstate Insurance v. ReitlerMontana Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.