Legal Opinion

Andrade v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 15, 1995No. 1 CA-SA 95-0176PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Judge.

Petitioner Carlos E. Andrade brings this special action to challenge the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charges against him. Petitioner asks us to rule that under double jeopardy principles 1 , an acquittal on a greater offense bars retrial on all lesser included offenses, including those on which the trial court had instructed the jury but on which the trial court granted a mistrial because the jury was not able to reach a verdict. For the reasons that follow, we accept jurisdiction but deny relief.

I

The facts necessary to resolve this special action…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. KnappArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jim B. Edmonds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. State v. TateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. State v. GlennSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. Frimmel v. Hon. sanders/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. LUIS A. v. Bayham-LesselyongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API