Legal Opinion

(PS) Lull v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 6, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01020Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER LULL, No. 2:18-cv-1020-MCE-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The case is before the court on defendant Ben Lamera’s motion for a protective order 18 seeking to preclude his deposition. ECF No. 39. For the reasons explained below, the motion is 19 granted in part and denied in part.1 20 I. Background 21 The first amended complaint alleges that in January 2017, plaintiff paid his property taxes 22 in one-dollar bills as a method for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. Thomas v. CateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Estate of Levingston v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API