Legal Opinion
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 4, 2012No. C 11-cv-1846 LHK (PSG)PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITIONS, AND GRANTING-IN-PART DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this patent infringement action, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) moves to compel Defendants and counter-claimants Samsung Electronics Co., LTD, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”) *262to produce six witnesses for depositions.1 Samsung cross-moves for a protective order to prevent the depositions.2 On March 27, 2017, the parties appeared for hearing.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Six West Retail Acquisition, Inc. v. Sony Theatre Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Mulvey v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
3Cited by82 opinions
- Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Flamingo Trails No. 7 Landscape Maintenance Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Estate of Levingston v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- (Various) in re Appraisal v. Anschutz CorpColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- (PS) Lull v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PS) Lull v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.