STATE Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. LEVENBURG
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, P. J.
This is an action to abate a nuisance pursuant to MCLA 600.3801; MSA 27A.3801, the so-called padlock statute. Named as defendants were Anderson’s Gardens, Inc., the holder of a class C liquor license, Harry Leven-burg, the sole stockholder of the corporation and operator of the bar, and Albert Porvin, titleholder along with Levenburg of ■ the building leased to Anderson’s Gardens for its operation.
A lengthy bench trial, resulting in some 52 volumes of transcript, was had in Wayne County Circuit Court over a period of months. On January 28, 1976, the trial judge issued an opinion finding…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People Ex Rel. Wayne Prosecuting Attorney v. SillMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. GoldmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. GatterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- State ex rel. English v. FanningNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Clemens v. Toneca, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- State ex rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. RichmondMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979