Legal Opinion

STATE Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. LEVENBURG

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1977No. Docket 27487PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, P. J.

This is an action to abate a nuisance pursuant to MCLA 600.3801; MSA 27A.3801, the so-called padlock statute. Named as defendants were Anderson’s Gardens, Inc., the holder of a class C liquor license, Harry Leven-burg, the sole stockholder of the corporation and operator of the bar, and Albert Porvin, titleholder along with Levenburg of ■ the building leased to Anderson’s Gardens for its operation.

A lengthy bench trial, resulting in some 52 volumes of transcript, was had in Wayne County Circuit Court over a period of months. On January 28, 1976, the trial judge issued an opinion finding…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People Ex Rel. Wayne Prosecuting Attorney v. SillMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. GoldmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. GatterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State ex rel. English v. FanningNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Clemens v. Toneca, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. RichmondMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API