Moir v. Moir
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Sioux District Court. — -William Hutchinson, Judge. Action for damages consequent on the alleged alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s husband by his father resulted in a judgment against defendant for $18,000. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
Husband and wipe : enticing and alienating : evidence : declarations of alienated spouse. I. The plaintiff was married to William • Moir, June 10, 1914. He left her December 7, 1915. She had been married before, and had two children by her first husband, Claude Hoeg. Prior to her marriage to William, she had been engaged as his housekeeper from about the middle of February of that year, and was divorced in .March. In September, 1914, he adopted her children. They lived on a farm rented from defendant, who resided about three miles distant. The defendant and his wife appear to have raised nine…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Hardwick v. HardwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Heisler v. HeislerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Pooley v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Glatstein v. GrundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Bearbower v. MerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Kovacs v. SzentesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.