Legal Opinion

Kovacs v. Szentes

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 7, 1943PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

In this action the plaintiff sought to recover damages from the defendant, his mother-in-law, on the ground that she had alienated the affections of his wife. Little purpose would be served by stating the facts found by the trial court, or considering the assignments of error seeking corrections in the finding except in one particular we shall discuss.

While the plaintiff was testifying in his own behalf he was asked certain questions as to statements made to him by his wife not in the presence of the defendant. When the first of these questions was asked, the defendant objected and the matter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Vivian's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  3. Cripe v. CripeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Fuller v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  5. Peck v. PierceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Low v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Commonwealth v. ContiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API