Legal Opinion

Heisler v. Heisler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 1911PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Butler District Court. — Hon. C. H. Kelley, Judge. The defendants are parents of plaintiff’s former husband, and in this action judgment for damages alleged to have been caused by the alienation of his affections was entered against them. They appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

In December, 1905, [plaintiff married Willie Heisler. She left him October 2, 1907, and shortly after-wards the bonds of matrimony were severed by a decree of divorce. She claims that he once loved her, and his affections were alienated by the machinations of the defendants. They admit that the attachment existed, and assert that it had never ceased, and denied that they interfered in his affairs save as parents might. She supposed up to the final separation that his regard for her was unabated, and at *505•the trial he testified that he loved her still. His acts,- however, in falsely accusing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerMississippi Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Tasker v. StanleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Multer v. KnibbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. McElfresh v. KirkendallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  5. Reed v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Glatstein v. GrundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  2. Bearbower v. MerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Rank v. KuhnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. McDonald v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Pooley v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API