Legal Opinion
Fieldstone Meadows Development Corp. v. Conservation Commission
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided October 14, 2004No. 03-P-517PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.
Acting under the Andover wetlands protection bylaw (town by-law), the town of Andover’s conservation commission (commission) denied the application of Fieldstone Meadows Development Corp. (Fieldstone) to perform work *266within 100 feet of a protected resource area.1 Fieldstone sought Superior Court review in the nature of certiorari. G. L. c. 249, § 4. The parties filed cross motions for judgment on the pleadings. A Superior Court judge allowed the commission’s motion, and a judgment entered affirming the decision of the commission. Fieldstone appeals.
We conclude that the commission…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- T.D.J. Development Corp. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- City of Newton v. BelgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Fafard v. Conservation Commission of ReadingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- SCIT, Inc. v. Planning Board of BraintreeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Macero v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Conroy v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Pheeney v. HouleMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
- Allen Homestead Development, LLC v. Town of Sturbridge Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006
- Asd Three Rivers Ma Solar, LLC v. the Planning Board of the Town of WilbrahamMassachusetts Land Court · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.