Legal Opinion
Pheeney v. Houle
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided July 25, 2008No. BRCV200700337PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Kane, Robert J., J.
Plaintiffs Herbert and Pamela Pheeney brought this action in the nature of certiorari pursuant to G.L.c. 249, §4, seeking to annul a decision by the Barnstable Conservation Commission (“the Commission”) denying them permission to construct a pier. This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(c) and Superior Court Standing Order 1-96. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs’ motion is ALLOWED.
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
The Pheeneys own property located at 0 Sand Point Road in Osterville shown as Parcel…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- T.D.J. Development Corp. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- FIC Homes of Blackstone, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Fafard v. Conservation Commission of ReadingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- DeGrace v. Conservation Commission of HarwichMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Regan v. Falmouth Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008