Fafard v. Conservation Commission of Reading
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Although the proposed construction did not encroach on wetland or a protective twenty-five foot “zone of natural vegetation” along the boundary of the wetland, the conservation commission of Reading (commission), on the ground that the construction itself or the use of the resulting house would infallibly cause degradation of the protective zone, declined to issue an order of conditions authorizing the proposed construction. The commission’s order was based on a town by-law, rather than on G. L. c. 131, § 40. On review in the nature of certiorari (G. L. c. 249, § 4), a judge in the Superior…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Forsyth School for Dental Hygienists v. Board of Registration in DentistryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- T.D.J. Development Corp. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- SCIT, Inc. v. Planning Board of BraintreeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Fitzsimonds v. Board of Appeals of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Arnone v. Commissioner of the Department of Social ServicesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Chandler v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Building Commissioner v. Dispatch Communications of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Garrity v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Fieldstone Meadows Development Corp. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.